Did Nazism have any ideological content besides mere aesthetics?
Basically all of (neo-)Nazi propaganda is just:
>x is pretty, y is ugly
Examples:
>whites are pretty, browns are ugly
>Germans are pretty, Jews are ugly
>gigachad is handsome, basedjak is ugly
>Renaissance art is pretty, modern art is ugly
>European architecture is pretty, African architecture is ugly
>Neoclassicist architecture is pretty, modern architecture is ugly
>tradwife is pretty, purple-haired feminist is ugly
They designated Poles as ugly, but kidnapped Polish children they deemed pretty:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_children_by_Nazi_Germany#Selection
>A child's "racial value" would determine to which of 11 racial types it was assigned, including 62 points assessing body proportions, eye colour, hair colour, and the shape of the skull.
>The failures that could result in a child, otherwise fitting all racial criteria, into the second group included such traits as "round-headed" referring to the skull shape. Children could be declared the third group for tuberculosis, "degenerate" skull shape, or for "Gypsy characteristics".[23] A girl who was later identified by a small birthmark would have been rejected had the birthmark been much larger.[24]
>These racial exams determined the fate of children: whether they would be killed, or sent to concentration camps, or experience other consequences.
>Many Nazis were astounded at the number of Polish children found to exhibit "Nordic" traits, but assumed that all such children were genuinely German children, who had been Polonized; Hans Frank summoned up such views when he declared, "When we see a blue-eyed child we are surprised that he is speaking Polish."[17]
