>>520195061
>putting restrictions on what people can eat that you would never put on yourself

We agree that free food is not a right, and what rights actually are, non-transferable and not to be imposed upon by force.

If free food isn't a right, that would imply that luxury and snack foods definitely aren't on that list. It's your money, why do you want niggers using it to fund Shaniquas twerkathon and backyard BBQ blast instead of the intention of the program? The name in and of itself should imply how far it has been abused: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance.

I don't want to see people between jobs in a shit economy go hungry, but why should they eat lobster and steak on your dime?

>>512525973
Pretty much this. Streamline the ancient purpose and process of marriage through modern means and conveniences. Fuck Ted Kaczynski, I'm going all in.

>education for women solely for the purpose of homeschooling children if the husband desires it, all done at home through internet schooling (zero chance for high school virginity loss)
>women debanked, no access to currency without a man
>government sponsored brothels for the women that refuse to comply or don't have hymen intact before marriage
>dating app, but only for father's to set up matches for their sons
>women have phones with dial restrictions to whatever the husband sets, also provides check in notifications to places that aren't church, home, grocery store, and approved female friends homes