>>106513592
This maid is very cute. Thank you for posting her.
>Then encourage positive discussions instead of participating in negative discussions as a third side
I am trying to encourage positivity. I want this to be the nicest, cleanest Maid Cafe on the internet. I want newmaids to see the posts here and become inspired to contribute positively. I want a culture shift. If this requires a "third side", then this is acceptable.
>Don't feed these people, they want to discuss anything, the Rust vs C++ and stuff about Indians is just an excuse
I'm not asking them to stop talking. I'm asking for a higher standard of talking. Instead of racism or transphobia, I'd rather see code examples explaining why she likes one language but not the other. I'd rather see technical analysis than noise. If I was to tell you that Java is for "white men" and Javascript is for "troons", I did not actually convey useful information. All you would know is that I like one language and dislike the other, without explanation. Even if that was all I wanted to convey, there are politer and more direct ways to do so.
>instead of doom I'll make flowers bloom for everyone around to see
4chan Search
3 results for "1c1f24f8f0d60df27fc04301873eadbe"
I am writing the MAIDS manual because the language is done. Once I finish it, I will test the language again to see if I can find bugs, and then release it.
>>106470918
This maid is very cute. Thank you for posting her.
>>106470918
This maid is very cute. Thank you for posting her.
>>106167633
>wearing maid outfits is gay
Nobody ever claimed otherwise.
>>106168266
>The mods actively follow people around that make stuff the glow niggers dislike. Doesn't matter if I change my posting style or jump to new IP with no cookies. Without fail within 2 minutes 3 or 4 of the same people will show up attempting to bully and spook me with lame shit like
>>we know what you posted last week
>The worst thing they do is purge things I've created from nearly all distro channels. Then turn around and claim I never follow through releasing projects.
This also happened to the maidposters. Someone even tried the experiment I suggested here >>106164343 and the results speak for themselves.
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106167821/#106167821
I suspect that given the very fast and repetitive nature of the replies, that they are probably bots, or at least augmented by bots.
>They really really hate people that encourage people to release into the public domain instead of falling for the licensing wars. Anyone that posts about how BSD, MIT and GNU licenses are just the same sides of the glow nigger die eat 3 days bans left and right. Same goes for anyone working on new p2p network protocols and something to replace browser engines+http. Anything that isn't 100% shitposting and bait gets run off the board fast.
I have also noticed this. If you post something to Public Domain, you will immediately have a number of retards/bots in your thread complaining about "cuck license" and demanding you use AGPLv4 or something totally unworkable like that, and swearing you will be "exploited" if you did not do this, ignoring that the goal of a Public Domain release is that anyone be able to do anything with the released materials. It is public and all wrapping it in a license more complicated than that does is decrease the number of people who will use or consider using it.
>wearing maid outfits is gay
Nobody ever claimed otherwise.
>>106168266
>The mods actively follow people around that make stuff the glow niggers dislike. Doesn't matter if I change my posting style or jump to new IP with no cookies. Without fail within 2 minutes 3 or 4 of the same people will show up attempting to bully and spook me with lame shit like
>>we know what you posted last week
>The worst thing they do is purge things I've created from nearly all distro channels. Then turn around and claim I never follow through releasing projects.
This also happened to the maidposters. Someone even tried the experiment I suggested here >>106164343 and the results speak for themselves.
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106167821/#106167821
I suspect that given the very fast and repetitive nature of the replies, that they are probably bots, or at least augmented by bots.
>They really really hate people that encourage people to release into the public domain instead of falling for the licensing wars. Anyone that posts about how BSD, MIT and GNU licenses are just the same sides of the glow nigger die eat 3 days bans left and right. Same goes for anyone working on new p2p network protocols and something to replace browser engines+http. Anything that isn't 100% shitposting and bait gets run off the board fast.
I have also noticed this. If you post something to Public Domain, you will immediately have a number of retards/bots in your thread complaining about "cuck license" and demanding you use AGPLv4 or something totally unworkable like that, and swearing you will be "exploited" if you did not do this, ignoring that the goal of a Public Domain release is that anyone be able to do anything with the released materials. It is public and all wrapping it in a license more complicated than that does is decrease the number of people who will use or consider using it.