>>520738729
>is the go to and norm.
and nothing wrong with that, the problem comes up when people dont abandon their failed theory despite evidence suggesting otherwise, and instead looking for a new theory they just double down with the failed one.
>Did you know Stonehenge was just a random construction
actually it wasnt a random construction at all, same as all the other "strange" sites all over the british isles.
turned out these were chemical factories to produce all kinds of chemical products. kinda like the pyramids in Giza but more like v0.1.