3 results for "1c8420f3979ed5fa6b2e8013423667c5"
>>33893236
I'm not sure what you're asking exactly, but I don't think you would want a boyfriend that watches porn (and masturbated) the same way you probably wouldn't want a boyfriend that smoked crack.
I agree it's a subject matter and inherently harmless, but the way it's being proliferated, especially to minors, and the way it latches onto your brains reward circuitry makes it a moot point really.
Doesn't matter though, because it's all about personal accountability at the end of the day. If you don't want to watch it, don't, if you do, be my guest. There is no real benefit from watching or even jacking off however. At this point there are mountains of real evidence showing how bad it fucks you up too, but you didn't ask for that so I'll spare you the details.
I would guess you take more issue with ultra religious guys who will go on a crusade to demonize videos of people fucking because they can't control themselves enough to not touch their dicks and insecure women who loathe the idea of their boyfriends looking at other women online. That's different.
But for me at least the thought process is very simple
>jacking off makes me feel like shit and takes energy away from pursuing actual sex
>therefore I will stop jacking off
That's about as deep as it should go. What other consenting adults do with their time and bodies doesn't really concern me, but as I said in the beginning, masturbating, as a guy at least I don't know if it's the same for women, only takes away from the sex you could be having with your (potential) gf.
>>33868454
>modern women
not that anon, but from what I've seen you post this seems like an incel thread disguised as a pseud literary advice thread to get anons to admit that "modern women == bad", but with plausible deniability.
In any case, good women are only as good as bad women are bad. Yin and yang and all that.
Can't have one without the other. If you take "bad" women out of the equation i.e. one's that don't lie, cheat, manipulate and all the other shit you wrote then the opposite "good" qualities will loose all value, because they can't be compared to anything. Humans are defined by their shortcomings just as much as they are by their virtues.
Unless you plan to make that gay little moral lesson the point of synthetic women existing in your """story""", then they have no real weight to your """world""" other than as a product and-or marketing campaign companies try to push on people who genuinely believe that you can replace real, authentic human connection, in it's flawed entirety, with a programmable, obedient piece of silicone.
I remember anon saying 3-4 years ago that women have no integrity. They'll ditch you if you lose and side with you if you win. I initially dismissed it as incel speak and moved on.
But recent societal shifts blackpilled me more than they should have.
I don't give a shit about politics, but now that it's cool to be right wing/conservative or whatever and being a commie leftie, lgbtq flag waving "ally" isn't held in high regard, women are all of a sudden presenting themselves as tradwives.
Not even just online, but at my Uni too, a lot of really outspoken classmates of mine are all of a sudden not as vocal about whatever cause they said they would lay their lives down for and some of them even became christian.
And the best part: they will pretend like they've always had the views they recently adopted to be looked at favorably by men and their social circle.
I'm not even mad anymore, but women's psychology is definitely not based in character integrity.