>>18082398
>The Romanists and Greeks CANNOT deny that tradition can become corrupt.
You seem to think they are capable of thinking.
>When tradition contradicts itself, who can say who is right?
People who don't care about truth, righteousness, or Jesus.
>There is no other standard but the word of God in holy scripture, which can burn away human innovations, errors and abuses from the sacred tradition.
100%. That is why King James Onlyism is so important.
4chan Search
4 results for "1d5026e1003d0930d33bd1b4627f6744"
>>18067611
>will you address this argument?
It would be my pleasure, rodent.
>Without an infallible interpretive authority, all interpretations of Scripture are fallible.
All human interpretations of Scripture are fallible because humans are fallible. The Bible is clear: While we are yet in this flesh we can not be without sin. Thus, even if we had the infallible interpretive authority (I do, more on that below), we are still prone to making mistakes in interpretation.
>Fallible interpretations cannot result in certainty about the meaning of an infallible text.
Incorrect. For example, you are a committed enemy of the gospel. You are certain about your interpretation, even though you are objectively wrong.
>Therefore,
You began. with a false premise, so your conclusion is not sound.
Your score: 0/1
>Determining which books belong in Scripture requires an authority external to those books.
This is wrong because, as it happens, the infallible interpretive authority you mentioned in the first argument does in fact exist in the person of the Holy Spirit. (1 Cor 2, KJV) Now observe:
The Holy Ghost is the author and interpreter of the King James Bible.
Furthermore, Jesus is the King James Bible.
Jesus and the Holy Ghost are two persons of the same God.
Jesus and the Holy Ghost are always in agreement, the latter taking orders from the former.
In this sense, Jesus and the Holy Ghost are not external to each other.
Therefore, the King James Bible and the Holy Ghost are not external to each other.
Therefore, the canonicity of the text of the King James Bible does not require an authority external to itself.
QED
(Continued)
>will you address this argument?
It would be my pleasure, rodent.
>Without an infallible interpretive authority, all interpretations of Scripture are fallible.
All human interpretations of Scripture are fallible because humans are fallible. The Bible is clear: While we are yet in this flesh we can not be without sin. Thus, even if we had the infallible interpretive authority (I do, more on that below), we are still prone to making mistakes in interpretation.
>Fallible interpretations cannot result in certainty about the meaning of an infallible text.
Incorrect. For example, you are a committed enemy of the gospel. You are certain about your interpretation, even though you are objectively wrong.
>Therefore,
You began. with a false premise, so your conclusion is not sound.
Your score: 0/1
>Determining which books belong in Scripture requires an authority external to those books.
This is wrong because, as it happens, the infallible interpretive authority you mentioned in the first argument does in fact exist in the person of the Holy Spirit. (1 Cor 2, KJV) Now observe:
The Holy Ghost is the author and interpreter of the King James Bible.
Furthermore, Jesus is the King James Bible.
Jesus and the Holy Ghost are two persons of the same God.
Jesus and the Holy Ghost are always in agreement, the latter taking orders from the former.
In this sense, Jesus and the Holy Ghost are not external to each other.
Therefore, the King James Bible and the Holy Ghost are not external to each other.
Therefore, the canonicity of the text of the King James Bible does not require an authority external to itself.
QED
(Continued)
If you are not a King James Only Baptist, you're not even in the game spiritually. Forget about first plate, you haven't even found the field.