>>7718993
yeah shapes are more fundamental. someone on /ic/ that's not brainwashed by muh fundies? a rare sight indeed, a man of culture.

>forms
sadly this is also a buzzword designed to make 2d design and fundamentals seem inferior/subordinate to 3d logic.

>If you 'factually' look at an artist that's trying to portray any form of realism (even anime) they usually will post their anatomy studies on their twitter or what not to feed the algorithm.
that's factually accurate, but an unbiased peer review would show they are trying to make good drawings before they are trying to draw "anatomy". you could do a "study" but it's never gonna be detached from a specific ___way___ of drawing something, shall I name explicitly what that's equivalent to? I trust after my previous posts the conclusion should be easy to follow.
it's why you see Japanese people say Xの描き方 (way of drawing X) instead of muh prescriptive fundies proko slop anatomy even when talking about realism anime styles, because the way you would draw something to make it look good directly involves drawing fundamentals. just saying "it has great anatomy" is devoid of actual drawing content thus logically and factually making it a buzzword.