>>4462824
>The writers stated that they only included a male self-insert protag, because that's what sold at the time.
The saddest part is that 20 years later, that's still the case

>>281253204
This is my #1 problem with the new show. It's called Panty AND STOCKING and the latter is barely in it while the former is now the exclusive main character. It's really weird how Brief and Scanty have both had far more screentime than two of the titular characters.

I know you faggos like it, but I don't care –it was a mistake to make S&K part of the main cast. And now we'll get even more characters with the angel boys. WHERE'S STOCKING SUPPOSED TO FIT IN???

I have porn addict fatigue.

>>529536572
I'm just tired of it personally. I just want to talk about things I like or be around people who don't interject politics into everything. Shows like "Hey Arnold" wouldn't exist anymore because of what you said. We can like things because they are cool or sexy. It's always been that way. It was a rule of cool, you didn't need a reason to do anything else. That's why you had games back in the day with girls with huge tits in magazines because it was hot. I mean look at the OG Lara Croft compared to now. Not everything needs a fucking explanation or cater to some fucking politic.