>>518629004
absolutely everything
4chan Search
10 results for "1f62d5dfaf3e7ee22e3928b24e871f07"
God/Gnosis/Grand Architecht.
Freemasons and Rosicrucians are quite based when you look into the subject, or at least a great portion of them, I'm sure that theres a huge portion of masons that are pro faggotry and degeneracy but in reality the core idea of freemasonry is bulding yourself and building your community, no wonder most of the founding fathers and important presidents were all freemasons. Traditionalism comes from freemasons like Evola, Guenon, Blavatsky, Steiner, etc.
Even Hitler and other National Socialist members were influenced by esoteric/masonic teachings through the Thule Society.
Freemasons and Rosicrucians are quite based when you look into the subject, or at least a great portion of them, I'm sure that theres a huge portion of masons that are pro faggotry and degeneracy but in reality the core idea of freemasonry is bulding yourself and building your community, no wonder most of the founding fathers and important presidents were all freemasons. Traditionalism comes from freemasons like Evola, Guenon, Blavatsky, Steiner, etc.
Even Hitler and other National Socialist members were influenced by esoteric/masonic teachings through the Thule Society.
How does one actually "embrace tradition"?
I’ve been getting told to „embrace tradition” for like 10 years now, after all this time I’ve decided to
take religion more seriously. So seriously in fact that I started looking into biblical scholarship. What I
found out was surprising, I have no idea what I was expecting, but one of the interesting facts I
learned is that the gospel of Mark was written first, both Matthew and Luke used it as a source.
This has been proven, in my understanding, basically beyond a shadow of a doubt. It also has
profound implications as to how to interpret the bible on the whole, since with the knowledge that
both the authors of Matthew and Luke had Mark in front of them, we must now make sense of the
changes and differences between those and Mark, since this would make them editorial changes.
This makes a lot of the bible make more sense and was very eye-opening as far as understanding the
text goes.
I could talk about the implications of this single discovery further, but this isn’t the point of the
thread. The point is: only after re-reading the bible in this light did I realise, the catholic church insists
that Matthew was in fact first, going against pretty much all scholarship on the matter, I assume in
order to place the founding of the church by Saint Peter arbitrarily early.
take religion more seriously. So seriously in fact that I started looking into biblical scholarship. What I
found out was surprising, I have no idea what I was expecting, but one of the interesting facts I
learned is that the gospel of Mark was written first, both Matthew and Luke used it as a source.
This has been proven, in my understanding, basically beyond a shadow of a doubt. It also has
profound implications as to how to interpret the bible on the whole, since with the knowledge that
both the authors of Matthew and Luke had Mark in front of them, we must now make sense of the
changes and differences between those and Mark, since this would make them editorial changes.
This makes a lot of the bible make more sense and was very eye-opening as far as understanding the
text goes.
I could talk about the implications of this single discovery further, but this isn’t the point of the
thread. The point is: only after re-reading the bible in this light did I realise, the catholic church insists
that Matthew was in fact first, going against pretty much all scholarship on the matter, I assume in
order to place the founding of the church by Saint Peter arbitrarily early.
>>214893560
Todo mundo tira sarro do Olavo. Imagina um astrólogo sub-100 IQ sem formação acadêmica ser o ápice intelectual dos neo-cons brasileiros.
Todo mundo tira sarro do Olavo. Imagina um astrólogo sub-100 IQ sem formação acadêmica ser o ápice intelectual dos neo-cons brasileiros.
>>24642108
>identify christianity as the good old days against "modernity"
Shame
Christianity is new age nonsense
>identify christianity as the good old days against "modernity"
Shame
Christianity is new age nonsense
>>512039914
>most of them hold values that were the norm for our grandparents
Yeah but MeeMaw and PaPaw could actually get laid, so if they chose not to that means a lot more than a dysgenic anti-social hobgoblin being unable to get laid. This is like someone who can't fight priding himself on being, "peaceful."
>everyone simply leads incredibly degenerate lives
OK, true, but that's where society is now. Most of us weren't born Based. You have to deal with your people as they are and what they can be, not what you want them to be or by forcing an anachronism on them. If they have no teacher, how will they learn, as the Apostle says.
>What Eric and his wife did was degenerate and shameful
I think it's obvious he would agree with that assessment and they're not even married to one another anymore.
Let's deal with the man as he is, not how he was. If we're going to be this way with Purity Spiraling, we're going to lose the kind of people who will be willing and able to make change and resistance.
Seriously, do you people think Based people are well-adjusted normies? Read a book.
>that does not mean we should ... turn a blind eye
He's not asking anyone to do that. He was up front about it years ago.
If he's Reformed and was ever part of a church it probably came up at some point while he was pursuing membership. He's long since paid the price.
>>512039936
This is the correct attitude to take. Actually, somewhere between the first guy I was talking to and this guy. Balance, folks, c'mon.
>most of them hold values that were the norm for our grandparents
Yeah but MeeMaw and PaPaw could actually get laid, so if they chose not to that means a lot more than a dysgenic anti-social hobgoblin being unable to get laid. This is like someone who can't fight priding himself on being, "peaceful."
>everyone simply leads incredibly degenerate lives
OK, true, but that's where society is now. Most of us weren't born Based. You have to deal with your people as they are and what they can be, not what you want them to be or by forcing an anachronism on them. If they have no teacher, how will they learn, as the Apostle says.
>What Eric and his wife did was degenerate and shameful
I think it's obvious he would agree with that assessment and they're not even married to one another anymore.
Let's deal with the man as he is, not how he was. If we're going to be this way with Purity Spiraling, we're going to lose the kind of people who will be willing and able to make change and resistance.
Seriously, do you people think Based people are well-adjusted normies? Read a book.
>that does not mean we should ... turn a blind eye
He's not asking anyone to do that. He was up front about it years ago.
If he's Reformed and was ever part of a church it probably came up at some point while he was pursuing membership. He's long since paid the price.
>>512039936
This is the correct attitude to take. Actually, somewhere between the first guy I was talking to and this guy. Balance, folks, c'mon.
>>24565953
>writer claims magic is real
>what they really mean is some vague spiritual mumbo jumbo that doesn't resemble magic at all
Why do they do this?
>writer claims magic is real
>what they really mean is some vague spiritual mumbo jumbo that doesn't resemble magic at all
Why do they do this?
>>510844623
not quite
not quite
Am I forgotten?