>>538005881 >posted this response immedaitely and had it saved and ready to fire
I don't even need to call you names, your taste in inferior women is enough of a tell.
>>536719310 >>536719312
And what is the value of showing 10 year olds experiments they can re-create at home?
Shouldn't the members of the space stations time be better spent?
It is perhaps that this is a disingenous argument to ragebait the mutt?
I'm starting to think it is.
