>>150006739
Why does anyone here think disney will suddenly make shit for guys now? Theyve always been gynocentric. Its in their DNA. They had the chance to have their own boys franchises when they made a bunch of male led action movies in the early 2000s under eisner but iger buried them in favor of more princess shit. And they couldve had their own boys franchise with marvel but they decided to estrogenize it up with "grrl power" shit like captain marvel and desexualizing black widow. They did even worse with star wars then how they mistreated marvel when they eventually bought that too. You people are insane the rat will never change it has been a shitty girls brand since that cheap bastard walt owned it and itll always be a shitty girls brand forever

>>149953762
>makes the most gynocentric company known to man whose influences beholdens animation to an infantilized stigma it still has yet to escape from
He was far from based

Why can they barely make anything good?
>inb4 "they used to make good shit"
No, almost all of disneys previous output over the years was garbage made for little girls. ESPECIALLY the renaissance era trash