>>82242800
yes, but the problem is, i have provided some arguments as to why its a GOOD thing that we live in a gynocentrist society. and the only thing you did was try to shame me, call me a cuckold, "i will outlast you", say that i hate myself, etc
and you have not explained why im wrong. havent even presented counter arguments or even other plausible ideas as to why gynocentrism is wrong
>>82242793
really?
because on the basis of moral desert, that is, the idea that evil people deserve to be worse off, then you could argue that women DO deserve to be better off
first of all, females outnumber males in veganism 5 to 1. for every male vegan there is 4 or 5 females. in protests ive been to before, i was literally the only guy... its actually extremely depressing to see my sex be that moral trash
second of all, i heard of arguement that say that females arent really logical deliberate creatures, unlike males. this would, in a way, would make them LESS morally culpable for their actions, much like how a child is not fully developed enough to discern right from wrong. im not sure how i feel about this line of reasoning, because i dont know how a females brain and decision making process work. but it is something i heard thats semi-plausible, based on the data ive seen
third of all, females commit much less rapes, murder, theft, violent crimes. cope all you want; its true. maybe they would do so if they could, but they cannot, and thus are innocent, as opposed to men who can and do these things (and are guilty of them)
again, men are NOT MORALLY INNOCENT. a great number of them are moral trash. if what ought be justice (which to me seems true), then i dont know how you can defend men
