>>534977190
>>534978350
Yeah I can imagine that DE discussion attracts a lot of politically obsessed weirdos. But it is not the same situation because the game itself is not presented in a way which 'filters out' the normal people. It looks like an artsy-gritty detective game which could anyone could take interest in. Then see pic related for comparison. Games like that will filter out everyone who isn't into that kind of thing, so you can be confident it is meant to appeal to a specific kind of person. The same applies to furry games.
>the only reason why it's more widely accepted is
You have to understand that most people see furry stuff as 'just weird'. There is a bias against it. Even if there is nothing fetishized in the work itself, people will prefer other things.
>you're avoiding scav because you think it's gonna be some gay tranny shit
Not exactly, it's furshit, which I think everyone recognizes as a different thing. But they are both avoided for similar reasons. Discovering that mechanically it's a really fun game would not change the fact playing it means staring at furry character art for hours, which is an undesirable experience for most people. Interestingly this doesn't apply to seemingly non-furry animal designs like those in Tunic or Ori.
>>534974895
I think cards popularized card videogames. It was inevitable. Cards are such an intuitive format for understanding probability and various mechanics by representing them as physical objects which move between different piles.
>>534981374
I was using it there in reference to games literally advertising themselves as being "diverse" in descriptions or tags.