>>216004394
I don't give a shit about kike lies. What I really want to know is why they chose this time in particular to bring up such an obvious, pathetic psyop
4chan Search
3 results for "2671a64cac2d0f204a08fdf7d80ec0a4"
>>519263961
This verse has been DEBUNKED. The oldest post that references this falsehood is LITERALLY from a Kike
This narration is NOT describing a sexual assault, and the wording “يركبون رسول الله ﷺ” is being misunderstood.
Let me break it down clearly:
---
1. This report appears in Musnad Aḥmad under the narrations of ʿAbdullāh ibn Masʿūd.
Yes — the story is real, and its chain is considered authentic.
But…
What is actually happening in the report is a supernatural encounter with non-human beings, not humans attacking him, and certainly not a sexual act.
---
2. Who are “الزطّ” here?
The narrator says:
> كأنهم الزطّ
“As if they were zutt”
This is a simile, not identification. The phrase “كأنهم” means “as though” or “as if.”
And even then, Ibn Masʿūd admits uncertainty and says "أو كما قال" multiple times — signaling hesitation and approximation about what they were.
The Prophet himself clarifies at the end:
> "هم نفر من الملائكة"
“They are a group of angels.”
or
> “They are from the angels, as Allah willed.”
This completely removes the idea that these are actual Zutt tribesmen.
---
3. The phrase “يركبون رسول الله ﷺ” — what does it mean?
The Arabic verb رَكِبَ has many usages beyond physical mounting. It can mean:
>to surround
>to press upon
>to come over or upon
>to overwhelm
>to get close to physically
>to pile onto (in a metaphoric or non-sexual sense)
In classical Arabic, it does not inherently imply a sexual act, especially with angels and prophetic contexts.
Context shows what happened:
The Prophet was reciting Qur’an to them the whole time.
After they left, he felt ثقيلاً وجِعاً — “heavy and fatigued” — a typical reaction to spiritual encounters (like revelation).
At dawn they departed.
Later a different group came in white garments.
Nothing here is sexual, physical, or abusive.
This verse has been DEBUNKED. The oldest post that references this falsehood is LITERALLY from a Kike
This narration is NOT describing a sexual assault, and the wording “يركبون رسول الله ﷺ” is being misunderstood.
Let me break it down clearly:
---
1. This report appears in Musnad Aḥmad under the narrations of ʿAbdullāh ibn Masʿūd.
Yes — the story is real, and its chain is considered authentic.
But…
What is actually happening in the report is a supernatural encounter with non-human beings, not humans attacking him, and certainly not a sexual act.
---
2. Who are “الزطّ” here?
The narrator says:
> كأنهم الزطّ
“As if they were zutt”
This is a simile, not identification. The phrase “كأنهم” means “as though” or “as if.”
And even then, Ibn Masʿūd admits uncertainty and says "أو كما قال" multiple times — signaling hesitation and approximation about what they were.
The Prophet himself clarifies at the end:
> "هم نفر من الملائكة"
“They are a group of angels.”
or
> “They are from the angels, as Allah willed.”
This completely removes the idea that these are actual Zutt tribesmen.
---
3. The phrase “يركبون رسول الله ﷺ” — what does it mean?
The Arabic verb رَكِبَ has many usages beyond physical mounting. It can mean:
>to surround
>to press upon
>to come over or upon
>to overwhelm
>to get close to physically
>to pile onto (in a metaphoric or non-sexual sense)
In classical Arabic, it does not inherently imply a sexual act, especially with angels and prophetic contexts.
Context shows what happened:
The Prophet was reciting Qur’an to them the whole time.
After they left, he felt ثقيلاً وجِعاً — “heavy and fatigued” — a typical reaction to spiritual encounters (like revelation).
At dawn they departed.
Later a different group came in white garments.
Nothing here is sexual, physical, or abusive.
This Al-Zutt propaganda to defame Islam is a JEWISH PSYOP
The oldest comment that references this falsehood is from a Kike
You literally cannot make this shit up
You literally cannot make this shit up