>>508328328
>First off, again with "centrism". Unless we define "centrism" differently it is not what I mean. "Moderate" is a spectrum (yeah, I get that there is the novel negative connotation) but "centrist" is not.
It's hard to give you some kind of stringent universal definition because that's not how sociology works.
If you ask me the "centrists" are the kind of people that barred and sabotaged Bernie Sanders in 2016 and replaced him with hillary.
This is the kind of "centrism" that I am talking about and hating so very much.
>Huh? I mean he is by no means perfect but what he's saying, at the very least, it a breath of fresh air compared to the usual bog of nothingburgers.
Yeah, but Merz will fail to lead with any conviction, is a ziocuck (pointing out this especially in-lieu of your previous allusions) and will fail to do anything even moderately economically "populist" - which is exactly what we need in a society being undermined and privatized by oligarchy and oligarchs rather than this "the niggers are the cause of your ailments" kind of bullshit that these same oligarchical structures and certain political grifters push in parts through their media scape.
>especially what the far left can do
The factors that made up the soviet empire was tyranny moreso than any leftist window dressing and collectivization was implemented such that it amounted to little more than imperialism by new means if you ask me
Either way, this is not instructive for dealing with the problems we have now
Yanukovich was right wing, trump is right wing, putin is right wing, AfD is right wing, fidesz is right wing, orban is right wing, fico is right wing
I think the discussion is blinded on one eye
>And yes, there is no real alternative to anything but the two extremes
If anything, the US is an example of what happens when you have a uniparty and oligarchy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7dHvqA-WB4
