>>106305942
This model is weird. Like, based on my experience testing Chroma models I can tell you it's 100% fixing imperfections on some prompts to the point you don't want to go back (pic rel). But it's cheating coherence on many concepts. Like uber slopping multiple subject prompts to the point they can't be done any more.
>>106306531

And it introduces a new type of artifact some of the images as well, though not all. Besides, something is off about the flash model's images being better than the base model. It makes no conceptual sense. Like Chroma just learns everything at first, then fucks itself when it learns more, or something like that. A regression of sorts has fixed it. That means somewhere in the training is the fuckup.