>>530431854
I will preface this by stating you should not get bogged down in stylistic quibbling. Even undergrads studying philosophy can call upon the wisdom of Euthydemus in this regard.
Though discourse on 4chan is essentially vitriolic, I hope you recognize that typing a 2000+ character response is a sign of respect first and foremost. The Latin, the derision, the pompous analogies, the purple prose - its entertainment for both myself, hopefully you, and the rabble - nothing more. When arguments are/can be articulated, specifically those of the specious variety, i cannot help but be drawn to them like a moth to a flame
My points are equally simple
>you inability to abstract yourself from your cultural analysis specifically when the object of OUR collective analysis is objectively a dual-natured fire goddess with a real world counterpart from a culture outside contemp euro indicates either bad faith/double standard
>"we arent Greeks" is a preposterous thing to say when the prime intellectual and by extension cultural movers of contemporary society were literally Hellenic in origin (st augustine) or based on tenuous understanding of political philosophy; that is, christianity -> scholasticism -> rennaissance -> enlightenment cultural-intellectual developments not only are hellenic in origin but also completely obliterated most of pre-christian western/central european traditional cultural norms
>you critiqued without substantiating
Regarding your greentext, evoking the male protective instinct as the primary or sole desideratum DOES in fact necessarily imply the females inferiority insofar as (the male) are engaging in the act of selection based on whether the protective instinct is evoked; and the protective instinct either cannot be evoked if the object can protect themselves [better than you can] or protection is not predicated on relative power which invalidates your original critique (ieMauvika does not evoke the protective instinct, she is inferior to X
