>>213966027
Whatever, dude. I don't know who's "pretending it's intelligent" and that "they're intellectually superior for liking it".
It's not mediocre. It won writing Emmys. I guess by YOUR calculations it's mid. And again you compare it to Friends. I already informed you that Friends was not as popular in the ratings nor is it currently worth the money Seinfeld is to streamers and syndicators, which definitely suggests that it's more widespread. You have jack shit to back up your age groups and across the world nonsense.
All I can tell you is that I was there for it when it was the biggest show on TV for the last half of its run, about 5 years of domination. And I've read all about it over the decades. It's just more highly regarded than Friends and especially Big Bang. Big Bang is dumb like Two and a Half Men. It just has nerd references. It's not actually smart comedy. Seinfeld was clever and witty in many ways. You can't win this argument. You're simply wrong.
It's up there with I Love Lucy and The Honeymooners and All in the Family as one of the best shows of all time. I didn't decide that. I'm just the messenger. There was a SeinMania thing for a while which Friends never achieved.
There's simply no comparison and I don't understand why you're rejecting the facts.