I guess the MBTI doesn’t work on me necessarily for sure the only thing that’s true is that I am an Fi-dom pretty much which basically comes down too I realized, what I learned from the MBTI to an extent is that most people are largely defined by their environment, living conditions and the present moment. Fi can see beyond the material world they say basically.

Also I realized, they call INFPs idealists, well that’s a complicated assumption and label, for one I don’t really agree with a lot of philosophy. I’m not entirely a ‘realist’ because there’s tons of philosophy work on what being a realist is or different forms of ‘realism’ but I think that’s basically a roundabout way, that’s basically a way of saying that you only accept the ‘present moment’ and its condition and you take them for all there is. That’s obviously some kind of a ruse I think. Simultaneously, an idealist is a fuggin weird as fuck philosophy, it basically means you think your thoughts are reality or some shit, and that reality doesn’t proceeds the mind and thoughts. What the fuck is that? God damn, I’m not exactly out right an idealist, but I do sort of have ideals in that I have strong principles and moral beliefs that don’t always have to do with just accepting reality. Strong moral standards and beliefs I guess. Well, I don’t know if they’re outright ideals entirely though. Like for example I value harmony, it’s almost an ideal, but it’s not entirely at the same time. Connection and harmony are pretty important to me.

I also can see the future and think ahead/plan pretty well. But in my life that’s been sort of the ongoing defining thing for me is that I’m not simply bound or defined by my external circumstances or environment

So they make a difference between sensor and intuitives but also all types seem like sensors to me because they’re so defined by their circumstances and external environments and stimuli