>64465199
Also forgot to mention that Buff displays the results table for the Colossus in this vid twice. First is at 3:57 - measured size is 10.5x13.125 versus nominal 10.25x13 - then the final results are at 23:49, nominal 10.25x13 versus measured 9.75x11.625. The first (3:57) table matches the numbers on the plate's cover better but we know from the RMA 1192 video that Buff's "drawn weights" aren't always accurate (6lb 3oz drawn, 6lb 4oz actual). Both RMA 1192s were precisely the same weight and thickness but it turns out the drawn weight (3oz) was wrong and the actual is 4oz. Would be a little odd for all the plates he got to be exactly the same. Would be a little stranger for the given weight to then be wrong. Anyways the question here is which table is accurate and which one is the mistake. In that same RMA 1192 video, Buff got plates that were 10oz heavier than advertised so he's no stranger to getting plates with "variances."
Regardless of the Colossus being overweight or not, the Atlant still (allegedly) outperformed it. I find that suspect but maybe I'm missing something.

>>64393555
>>64394199
Well, here we are, the quick and dirty RMA armor guide. This overlaps a lot with the older "rma sucks" infographic and that's by design. This goes model by model, gives specs, observations as to what the "catches" are, and viable alternatives. I included the #1189, #1199, and #1192 even though they've been discontinued just for completion's sake. Since this is meant to be a current reference guide, I am not getting into the pre-2017 models like the BZ API plate, the SAPI / ESAPI, the #1145, or the pre-2013 RMA Supply plates that allegedly used Chinese and other import materials. That's ancient lore that, IMO, has no bearing on RMA the company today.