>>513844796
I agree with you, but the issue with truly radical action is that coordination is extremely dangerous and the network of likeminded individuals is spread far too thin. The people who think like you and I would need to exist vastly closer if we desired true revolutionary action. I do not think it is particularly easy to create a properly radical collective, just because the general population is so brutally demoralized. You have to spend vastly too much time functionally incepting normalfags into radical thought and this frustrates the vast majority of radicals for obvious reasons.
I do think there will be no 'true' leader for this one. It's going to be somewhat collectivist, eclectic, and have a shitload of fucking weird and wacky ideas from every side of the aisle.
In the end, lolberts and libtards and neocons and fencesitters are all going to be forced to learn that EVERY extreme can be on the same team.