>>76812088
>>its just CICO
how do you retards still exist in the big 25 (moving onto 26 btw)
>In groups of four, men and women in their 40s and 50s, some of them lean and some overweight, overate for 30 d by 1000 kcal/d (4186 kJ/d) more than they needed to maintain weight. On an average dietary mixture for Americans they gained a mean of 2.68 kg, and on a diet high in carbohydrate (60 per cent of energy) they gained 2.73 kg. However, on a diet high in protein and fat (70 per cent of energy), they gained significantly less, 1.75 kg. On all three diets the subjects should have gained 5 kg, if adipose tissue has an energy density of 6 kcal/g, and had there been no adaptation. There was adaptation, as evidenced by an average 7 per cent increase in thermogenesis, which was measured by 24-h direct and indirect calorimetry. Energy balances were calculated from: bomb calorimeter values for food and body waste; change in fuel stores from body composition measured by densitometry; and daily expenditure estimated from the net food intake needed to maintain body weight during a 30-d control period.
4chan Search
3 results for "2f7cea5656e3841defba46e0bbb1d61c"
>>76760070
There is actually, and you've been told it hundreds of times. You just pretend it doesn't exist.
>Calories are next to meaningless, they only serve as a general guideline as to how much food you're consuming
>A calorie is not a calorie
>High quality protein from meat is worth more in your body and promotes muscle growth and fat loss
>Meanwhile junk food (carbs, sugar, seed oils) promote muscle degradation and lipogenesis
>By this logic you can orient yourself towards a more nuanced dieting perspective, where something like donuts are 2x as fattening as chicken thighs, even with the same amount of calories (2x number is made up)
"In groups of four, men and women in their 40s and 50s, some of them lean and some overweight, overate for 30 d by 1000 kcal/d (4186 kJ/d) more than they needed to maintain weight. On an average dietary mixture for Americans they gained a mean of 2.68 kg, and on a diet high in carbohydrate (60 per cent of energy) they gained 2.73 kg. However, on a diet high in protein and fat (70 per cent of energy), they gained significantly less, 1.75 kg. On all three diets the subjects should have gained 5 kg, if adipose tissue has an energy density of 6 kcal/g, and had there been no adaptation. There was adaptation, as evidenced by an average 7 per cent increase in thermogenesis, which was measured by 24-h direct and indirect calorimetry. Energy balances were calculated from: bomb calorimeter values for food and body waste; change in fuel stores from body composition measured by densitometry; and daily expenditure estimated from the net food intake needed to maintain body weight during a 30-d control period."
There is actually, and you've been told it hundreds of times. You just pretend it doesn't exist.
>Calories are next to meaningless, they only serve as a general guideline as to how much food you're consuming
>A calorie is not a calorie
>High quality protein from meat is worth more in your body and promotes muscle growth and fat loss
>Meanwhile junk food (carbs, sugar, seed oils) promote muscle degradation and lipogenesis
>By this logic you can orient yourself towards a more nuanced dieting perspective, where something like donuts are 2x as fattening as chicken thighs, even with the same amount of calories (2x number is made up)
"In groups of four, men and women in their 40s and 50s, some of them lean and some overweight, overate for 30 d by 1000 kcal/d (4186 kJ/d) more than they needed to maintain weight. On an average dietary mixture for Americans they gained a mean of 2.68 kg, and on a diet high in carbohydrate (60 per cent of energy) they gained 2.73 kg. However, on a diet high in protein and fat (70 per cent of energy), they gained significantly less, 1.75 kg. On all three diets the subjects should have gained 5 kg, if adipose tissue has an energy density of 6 kcal/g, and had there been no adaptation. There was adaptation, as evidenced by an average 7 per cent increase in thermogenesis, which was measured by 24-h direct and indirect calorimetry. Energy balances were calculated from: bomb calorimeter values for food and body waste; change in fuel stores from body composition measured by densitometry; and daily expenditure estimated from the net food intake needed to maintain body weight during a 30-d control period."
