>>536368573
>>536369790
>you believe Foxybro being... protagonists of all the games was intended since 4 when Michael as a character didn't exist?
Michael AFTON didn't exist in 4, but Mike did. I pointed out the connections between the players of 1-4. It wasn't easy to decipher or even well-told, Scott himself said FNAF4 was too cryptic and how with SL he wanted to make things clear, but it was the intention. Idk how you can argue this when all of SL is one big "LOOK THE FNAF4 PLAYER IS FOXYBRO AND ALSO MIKE SCHMIDT!", then he dropped the Logbook to further hammer the nail. Everything about 4 since it came out has only served to further MikeDreamer and Mike as the protagonist of 1-6 in general
>some easter eggs... were... taken as completely irrelevant... But the FNaF1 phone call is an extremely obvious one with no meaning
Idk what to tell you. He said he didn't put random easter eggs, you even point out how one seen as random wasn't, then you say another was random. You're wrong. Sorry. Name another easter egg in base FNAF4. Literally all of them make sense with MikeDreamer.
>Furthermore Scott in that post heavily implied you could solve FNaF4 with just what the game gave you, but your theories rely on later lore.
FNAF4 WAS solvable with just it and 1-3, but Scott said that knowing what the story's intention was. He later realised things weren't clear at all and literally said the community FAILED to solve 4. If CCDreamer was right, then why'd he say the community didn't solve it? As you said, it was the common consensus until SL and Logbook even among those who didn't believe in DreamTheory, which was a good deal of the community. Also MikeDreamer doesn't rely on later lore, just like how WillTrap don't rely on Pizza Sim; it's just useful to use later evidence to clarify so some theories (like MikeTrap) don't have any wiggle room to survive