>>716257917
>So, i do not understand the Stop Killing Games movement or whatever.
I think it goes like this
>Shitty game by shitty studio and publisher is released
>retards wants to play it madly, for some reason
>gets all the redflags possible and warnings from other people online and irl
>retard buys it anyway
>despite enjoying it game flops
>since it was a shitty game by shitty publisher it's not a product but a service
>due floping the provider ends the service
>retard makes a tantrum despite being warned about all of this beforehand
>retards unite (with equally low IQ as collective if not worse)
>Stop killing games takes shape trying to use the goverment to make shitty studios to allow retards to play the shitty toy they "bought" to keep "working" despite not being a product but a service
As expected online retards will try to dismiss any flaw on it in their attemtp to turn something where the consumer is in the wrong into a crusade of grandilocuent levels on par with human rights n shiet. Just because a retard was obtuse and still paid for The Crew
Surely involving a goverment is going to be an improvement and nothing could go wrong lmao
