>>28667655
>dishonest
Because you've provided one thing saying that they don't have synchro problems? Are you retarded Anon or do you simply not understand that you provide proof to back up your claim that the transmission doesn't have synchro problems. Like I did >>28667625.
>>28667658
>is too stupid to follow a reply chain
Hondafags really are this retarded I guess. Mid 20s while running premium is pretty terrible for a 4cyl subcompact when a 5.0 makes double the power on 87. There are 5.0s on fuelly with 33mpg for their best mpg and average low 20s.
Also, why are both of you stuck on Mustangs when the posts you were replying to weren't talking about them?