>>103959808
>Does that even work?
Not only it doesn’t but it puts the channel in a completely different recommendation bucket: the “lo-fi girl”-style one of 24/7 livestreams. IMO it kills a vtuber channel.

>>103959803
> Jesas.. WHY even bother to do vtubing
They don’t just “do vtubing”, they go hard and one of them (at the time this pic was made) has
>ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN STREAMS THIS YEAR
for a median of peaks of FIFTEEN (15)
>meaning sixty three of those streams had fewer than 15 people watching at their peak
Brave Group is running some scheme there: they just posted a loss of 2.5B Yen and, yet
>THEY FUCKING DEBUTED A SECOND YUMENOS GEN

>>103899007
See >>103899085, I am not even disagreeing, just saying there is no significantly large market for male vtubers and it takes an inordinate amount of company wide effort to succeed at it and, barring that, it is almost guaranteed failure
>idk how Brave does it
They might unironically be either laundering money or grifting VC money VShojo style.
They have a literal ONE VIEW branch
>sometimes the audience for their guys is ONE viewer
and they debuted a second gen for them anyway.

It is impossible that they're making money on that so they can only be doing something shady as fuck. Same with globie

>>103656939
>are they even big enough to have a sub
Actually Brave Group went into a buying spree and now they have some 500 vtubers in some 30 different branches
>all unremarkable, like YUMENOS
Imagine streaming ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN TIMES in 2025 with guaranteed half of it being to an audience lower than 15 people!

>>103607682
>>103607914
>>103607670
>How on earth does one get to more streams than median viewers...
WELL; if you guys think Uyu is powerful, KNEEL to this bloke right here, from YUMENOS
>pic related
ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN STREAMS THIS YEAR
>median of peaks: FIFTEEN (15)

I don't know what Brave Group got on these blokes but it's looking like they took a huge loan with the company and can't stop streaming until they pay it back