>>106184344
>IPS
Let me get this out of the way by saying this: as a computer monitor, I intend to use it facing me dead on.

If this was a television in my living room? Yeah I wouldn't use that shit. It's not perfect and I'm under no illusion about that. But for my desktop and _my_ uses? I find the problems don't outweigh the benefits.
The IPS glow/blooming isn't an issue for me if a scene isn't literally 0,0,0 black with intense highlights.

The only media that has ever made me notice blooming, and it occurred in a miniscule portion of it, was in Dead Space. It is a exceedingly small occurrence that I can put up with it for the benefits it otherwise have.

More lighting zones and/or better dimming algorithms helps here. The China men have better miniLED monitors on market than the US or Europe. FFalcon U8 is supposedly even better than the Innocn 27m2v I have. Redmagic has their 5000 zone one in the lab that they displayed at a tech show 2 years ago or something.

>With modern
I'm talking about consumer affordable technologies in the context of their relevant time periods of usage so we're on the same page.

4k? I don't know of a single 16:9/16:10 CRT that does that resolution. I doubt it exists, if it does it's probably as expensive back then as a tandem display is nowadays. I don't really care about halo products that are tens of thousands, yeah they exist, but I don't work in a field that does video editing.

I looked up what QSXGA CRTs existed, now correct me if I'm wrong here, but it's a tiny list. The actual display sizes excluding bezel is tiny too. Then you have retarded caveats like this: "Taking full advantage of this monitor's capabilities on a modern graphics card requires a very high bandwidth DAC, capable of at least 534z. This will allow it to display 2880x2160 at 60hz"

Anyway, cheap and 1200p? At 60hz? 50hz? I remember using CRTs and I don't want to go back. Shit is literally headache inducing on cheap monitors.