• Proof from the Docket: Entries show extensive discovery battles over financial records, depositions, and documents from Epstein’s estate (e.g., Docket Nos. 154, 162, 217–245). For instance:
• Motions for summary judgment (Nos. 217, 222) include declarations with hundreds of exhibits (many redacted or sealed) detailing wire transfers, payments to “girls or women,” and bank statements (e.g., Exhibit 204 in No. 242, a 2014 Epstein bank statement). These exhibits reference “cash payments” and “financial benefits from Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein-related entities, or Epstein-related individuals” (No. 158).
• Depositions of key figures like JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon (mentioned in related media) and witnesses like Mary Erdoes and William Langford (Nos. 187, 158) probe the bank’s knowledge of Epstein’s activities. A minute entry (May 12, 2023) grants USVI permission to interrogate JPMorgan on revenue from Epstein, implying trafficking-generated funds.
• The docket’s volume of sealed/redacted materials (e.g., Nos. 15, 142, 147, 154–160) suggests sensitive evidence, such as victim payments or internal bank memos ignoring “red flags” like Epstein’s sex-offender status.

>>513944298

Likely Outcome: Given the strength of the prosecution’s evidence, securing an acquittal is a long shot. My best chance lies in discrediting the DNA or footage through expert testimony or procedural errors, combined with a compelling alternative narrative. If the case proceeds to trial and the evidence holds up, a plea deal may be the most realistic way to avoid a full conviction on both charges.