>>4458785
I wasn't talking about the equivalent of a lens flare and you know it. I was talking about the fact that you said a good photo has to be taken with something like a DSLR camera and a tripod, implying a high resolution and stable image or something like that, which a pinhole exposure doesn't always offer because it can show signs of distortion along the edges or excessive noise, yet be taken in an artistic and proper way and the latter can be intended artifacts for creative purposes.

To refresh your memory:
>There is no way a pinhole camera will ever subject photos to oversharpening, HDR merges, or smeary noise reduction. IT WILL NOT COVER THE WORLD IN GREEN AND PURPLE BLOTCHES or turn bark and leaves into weird hazy wormy nonsense. It will simply produce a creamy and dreamy image of a STATIC (ignores the blur from a long exposure) scene with vibrant film colors.