>>514782198
>She seemed really into me though, and I’m not really sure why.

>>60630872
kek. maybe actually read what OP had to say?

So what you are saying is during a time when you were allowed to be a maverick and stray from the current trend it spawned new and interesting ideas?
So what you are also saying is carbon copy clones produced now a days who can only sample each other and older songs who have to toe the line make unappealing unoriginal music?

You don't say.....