>>514865445
>Yes, if we're using scholarly labels, I consider myself an animist first, and a polytheist second.
would you go as far to call the polytheist (Depicted in human form) is a 'corruption'?
it can easily lead to hubris and misunderstandings that you're currently facing right now.
>Well isn't that interesting that you called us too christian, huh?
well this is more of an attitude that you're right and he's wrong. that is very christian/mudslime.
>You have literally no reason to believe this is the case for Europeans.
What? why not? BEHOLD (picrel) mithras slaying the bull 17,000 years ago at a cave in france...its just not called that, yet
>Show me the laws of the cosmos constantly changing and I'll believe that the gods are always changing.
Things appear to be changing when you zoom in, zoom out and we're on a processional cycle about every 26k years... zoom out even more and there's probably a larger one.