>>2217589
>Meanwhile I'll start thinking of potential ruleset variants and we'll put it to a poll afterwards (if it's cool with everybody else)
That sounds good to me. Maybe we can all agree on some restrictions beforehand, like not using Curse Anne (although that'd be fine with me). I think that any build has an intuitive enough counter build available.
>>2217716
Fair enough, just report back once you're ready or if you can't make it for unrelated reasons.