Here's my AI generated counter vibe to this AI sloppa

1. Direct Action with the Court (The Most Powerful Method)

The judge presiding over the case has the most immediate authority. The other parties (defendants) also have a vested interest in pointing this out.

How to Do It: You don't have to be a party to the case to bring this to the court's attention. You can file a Letter to the Court.

Draft a concise, respectful letter addressed to the Clerk of Court for the Northern District of California, with a copy to the presiding judge (Judge [Last Name], you can find this in PACER).

Subject: Letter Regarding Possible AI-Generated Content in Complaint, Case No. 3:25-cv-06325

Content: Politely and objectively point out the specific hallmarks of AI generation you've identified (e.g., the sensationalist language, rhetorical questions, and narrative style in paragraphs X, Y, Z). Note that such language is highly unusual and unprofessional for a legal pleading and may not meet the standards of Rule 11 (which requires a reasonable inquiry and that the filing is not being presented for an improper purpose).

Key Phrase: You can state that you are bringing this to the court's attention "pursuant to the court's inherent authority to manage its docket and ensure the professionalism of the bar."

What it Does: This essentially forces the judge to look at it. The judge could then issue an Order to Show Cause, requiring the attorneys from Ahdoot & Wolfson to explain under oath why they should not be sanctioned for filing a document that appears to be AI-generated without proper vetting.

I will be getting an envelope and a stamp.