>>18610322
I'll bite

AAA
>1 show per month
They do non TV shows trough the week, unless you refer to the weekly TV show
>12-16 shows per year
Wut but they have a weekly TV show and they do non TV shows through the week
>Not a single arena of our own
of their own* fixed it for your, but yeah that's true but if you are on the road why would you need an arena? WWE doesn't need any arenas except the performance center, even AEW doesn't need them for the same reason, because they are on the road.
>No more than 10 wrestlers under contract
You mean long term contracts, but yeah they just have a few long term contracts, iirc they have 50 on normal short term contract, and around 100 on-call basis mostly indie people
>In the end it was sold because it was in the red and in debt.
As I said companies don't buy broke companies when they have shareholders biting their asses behind, plus AAA doesn't have hard assets, at best they own some of the luchadores's names and a few long term contracts like you said and that's it, and that alone isn't worth 50 million dollars.

Companies sell some of their share to bigger companies to grow, it doesn't need to be 100% but once 51% of the company is sold it's considered officially a sellout since the original CEO doesn't have creative control anymore and the old CEO is now considered an employee which is what happened, but we don't know how much of it was sold and how much was a cash out (money directly being paid to the old CEO not for the business).

I'm not gonna argue about the CMLL stuff because it's mostly true, but having bigger numbers doesn't mean it's better, CMLL is known and has been widely criticized due to their contacts being lowballers, many weekday shows being fillers, arenas being kinda irrelevant due to the industry nature (on the road), and 90 years of great business yeah but can't deny they also tried to sellout to WWE.

tldr; You are just trying to start a console war by having a CMLL bias real lucha fans love both.