>>538173178
It's cool looking, especially in the PAN version, but I never bothered reading much about it. Boomers are all convinced it was way better as a FT plane than the MB-339, Personally I disagree.
On the combat side IIRC (from a comment under a video) its biggest drawback was trying to meet 1:1 the absurd NMBR-1 requirement of a max empty weight of 6800 lbs which meant no room to grow with MLU etc.
Which was a fatal flaw, Especially when we consider that at the time jets became obsolete in a matter of 5-6 years.
>>538174031
Nice colors, where are you flying?