>>106541204
Maybe my posts went a bit too harsh on flatpak, so just to be clear you should use whatever works for you. Installing packages the usual way isn't perfect either, if flatpaks work for you then use them. I understand some people "need" them, specially when running something that isn't bleeding edge, I just hate how flatpaks are shilled as *the* way to install programs on Linux, but no one explains why or how they work. Also, a lot of programs are only officially available as flatpaks, so if it's either using that or an unofficial binary from the AUR (if you're running something Arch-based), which isn't the end of the world but I rather have multiple options available. If only all programs were distributed like picrel.