in terms of fighting games wwe is capcom
>lots of talking with watered down simple product and lots of overcharging for premium content
and snk is aew:
>aew spends way more money than they take in
>low numbers in viewers and ticket sales, especially compared to their infancy and when cm punk was there
>bad booking with no real stars
>some of the stars they had went over to wwe
>stubborn shitty fans who push away potentially interested fans with their attitudes and complain all day about the other promotion and act like their own favorite brand is the only real pro wrestling around when it's just full of acrobatic stunts and garbage mudshow antics with heatless feuds nobody in the audience reacts to
>subpar camerawork/visuals work
>lots of buggy technical issues with audio/video feeds
>employees half the time have no idea how to really do their jobs

>>527062846
that's not kenny first off, and second, snk is like aew where its stupid fans are convinced that aew "wins" because it has "better rasslin than that wwe slop (capcom)" because some of its fans give it high imaginary ratings for matches that don't actually pay any bills or draw big crowds or get lots of money in return
and it's only able to survive because the guy in charge has access to lots of money from his dad's patent business
sound familiar? anyone with only a left brain couldn't figure it out, but it's clear as day to anyone else that having access to lots of money to burn without return draws a parallel between the saudi prince and tony khan('s dad)