>>82102889
>"humans aren't animals", the post
Yes, because things seen in nature are only applicable to animals which humans could never also be. Have you never seen a nature documentary and thought about how that could apply to humans?
>the male bird builds a nest and dances to show off his personality and beautiful feathers for a chance to mate with the female bird but that could NEVER heckin' happen in humans in any equivalent fashion whatsoever
What are fancy cars, a big house, a nice job, rippling muscles, height, you name it?