>>725003995
>Wrong, she published it freely on youtube,
Uh anon?
T-this doesn't look very free. Haha

>This is retarded and false
>Many recent cases have centered on whether the use is transformative or iterative, with transformative use more likely to be considered fair. Transformative uses include such use of portions of a work in parodies or thumbnail images that reproduce a full–sized image but for a different purpose, such as a search engine.
Transformative works are fair use.Anita just took the footage for herself.

>Hot tip for both you retards: google: "Do you need to credit sources for fair use", and report back to me with your findings.
Hmm
https://guides.lndlibrary.org/copyright/fairuse
>Educational use does not automatically render a use fair; this is just one helpful factor. For example, note that many materials are created specifically for the educational market and fair use cannot be relied upon to make these works “free.”

Looks like Anita is up shit creek. That's okay, she admitted herself she violated people's rights on it and went to accredited them. Would she have done so if she wasn't caught? Probably not. She did make 150K off of someone else's work.