>>937889322
>Models are built from real data
Nope. Well, maybe just to start with something, but it's all fake after that. If they were real data, they would have to cool the past.
>NOAA
Check it out. This is NOAA V4 Adjusted data. It's not perfect but they destroyed everything previous when the Climategates happened. Use Season Ranking, input what you want to see, and choose your area. Click the pins to see the data. There is nog change to be found from NOAA's data.
http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/
>NASA
They just copy NOAA's data.
>independent institutions
They usually copy NOAA's data but may also run USHCN/GHCN through their own models.
>The global average isn’t a random number
Did you read what I wrote? It is a number, but it doesn't mean anything. What's the average of your house? Make sure you measure the cool bathroom, behind the fridge, under the sunny windows, etc. Make sure it's every square foot and that you take records every 10 minutes for 24 hours. Now you have data for that day. Does that tell you how warm it is on your couch? If you turn the oven on, is your house the hottest evah?
>And no, warming at the poles does matter. It disrupts jet streams, melts glaciers, raises sea levels
Yeah, you didn't read what I wrote at all.
