>>534088650
>Is losers queue/"games that are designed to be a loss" real?
Yes. Even the no.1 elo guy will lose some games regardless of how skilled they sre, it's natural.
>Do you ever get the feeling that when you lose a suspected force loss, the enemy team isn't good, your team is just worse?
Yes kinda, sometimes in your team will pick stuff like teemo and shaco or nid who type all champ select and insta lose game from draft and no one dodges.
>Are high MMR and high stats the only thing that matters so you get better queues?
Nah the game just puts you in bad one sided sweep games time to time, you can't even dodge without getting punished or look up igns for mass chain losing players so people just roll with it. You also get enemy smurfs a lot these days.
The only way to get "better queues" is knowing meme drafts or strong enemy comps compared to yours in champ select or just player behaviour (ally picking around everyone's picks or griefing in chat/getting last pick to pick weak champs against enemy) to dodge and save LP and time or know when to stop playing after chain winning or starting to lose before it becomes a downward spiral. So a lot of compulsion control and trying to think around the teams. Also ignoring professor tag systems or checking out masteries in loading screens etc that may give you a predetermined impressions or some form of psychological warfare.