>>95824644
>>95824758
Hi, sorry it took so long to write this promised reply, I got sidetracked, both on things completely unrelated as well as doing some reaserch as to make sure this post is extra accurate. It’s not the easiest thing in the world to write posts like these, since I struggle to understand how an inteligent man with modern tools still refuses to hear the good news. What would you consider credible evidence? I mean the tomb was empty…

I guess I’ll try throwing more citations your way.

>Jesus was crucified.
This is obviously true, and very self-evident. This is not something anyone, other than Christ’s enemies, would have made up. The entire point of Mark’s gospel is that nobody understand why it must happen, until it happens. Even Saint Paul, to whom Jesus appeared, is astonished by Christ’s sacrifice as of the time of his epistles. But, apparantly you need sources, so: literally ANY history book that mentions Jesus.
On a more serious note, if you want an ancien source, he pagan Phlegon of Tralles mentiones the crucifixion in detail, in fact, some would argue he presupposes an empty tomb, but I’m getting Ahead of myself.

1/4