>>106254490
Wait what there are distributions that automatically sign kernels? And what's the reason? Kernel isn't an EFI-executable? Right?
>>106253377
Yes you can, it's a Microsoft anti-feature to not allow it for Windows. Assumed you EFI-boot: the thing won't boot on other PCs, just saying case you thought it would.
>or should I just dual boot?
That scenario *is* dual booting lmao. All systems have their relevant boot entry, it's just one for Linux that sits on the said SSD.

>>105937304
>Yes, UEFI because it's not 2005 anymore
Can't assume that because people have god knows what BIOS settings in play. Some neckbeards swear by BIOS boot.

>I've had Windows fuck up the bootloader when dualbooting 2 different Windows installs, which is still really impressive
Windows follows god knows what logic and I assume both of them used the same human readable name
which could've caused the fuckup.