>>40937613
> i'm a pretty weird type
>intp 5w4 549 sp/sx
This and INFP/4w5's are actually very over-typed among people that are interested in personality theory in the first place, so it's not weird at all, really. Especially if the way you figured you are this type is that you took a quiz and answered like a person who is curious about esoteric systems for personal understanding, which is just another way of saying 5/4. It's just a feedback loop, it's not really telling you much. I use the personality database for this sort of thing, and I don't really claim to know people's type unless I see them from afar, as that actually makes it much simpler. It also helps to have a tally of votes on someone, as that makes it easier to figure where people are going wrong with their typing, which does happen often. Interestingly enough, if you look at an Enneagram/MBTI combo on the database you will see an actual resemblance among the resulting people/characters which is way more clear than this astrology correlation. Try going there and putting in "ENTP 7w8" for example and you can see the same facial structure, hairstyles, and general appearances show up again and again. Physiognomy is absolutely real, but I have reservations about astrology for the time being. Perhaps the database will add it one of these days, that would certainly make examining it's validity much easier.