>>515084708
Ironically the New Testament is an astrological parable with Jesus taking the place of the Sun, most Christians are just never taught that (for obvious reasons).

>>17978403
You know the New Testament is an astrological parable, right?

>>17955092
The priests at the top of the Vatican are obviously smart enough to know the New Testament is only an astrological parable anyway. Only the ignorant take the story literally.

>>17954788
Christianity is the semitic transmutation of the Roman Cult of Sol Invictus. If you're still taking it literally like this anon >>17954858
then you don't understand it. The New Testament is an astrological parable, not a historical account of anything.

>>513387673
Obviously those in the Vatican have studied enough about Christianity to understand that the New Testament is an astrological parable so they're not going to take its stories literally (even though they're forbidden from communicating that to the NPC masses because most won't be able to wrap their heads around why a religion is still important even if its metaphorical).

>>17911432
They got lucky, especially considering Christianity was only the semitic transmutation of the Roman Cult of Sol Invictus anyway.

>>17901312
The New Testament itself is an astrological parable but most Christians will never understand that fact.

Christianity was merely longstanding pagan solar archetypes transmuted through a semitic lens, hence why it grew in popularity so quickly.

>>508128648
Or, he rotted in the cave and his followers made up the resurrecting story after the fact to draw parallels with pre-existing solar archetypes found in other local religious systems. The delusion that you are literally God is going to come crashing down hard alongside the reality you're not.