>>213085555
checkem
>According to Scorsese, Aster “dives right into the side of American life that many people can’t bear to look at or even acknowledge — no one wants to listen to anyone else, which is frightening.” Such soft-headed thinking could also be applied to Killers of the Flower Moon, Scorsese’s own shaming of America’s social rot and systemic racism. That was Scorsese’s first politically pointed movie, conceived during Covid’s national insecurity. But Eddington is equally out of touch; it’s just another overblown Aster horror show (Beau Is Afraid, Part 2) and, because of its violent excess, of little significance. Eddington is so solemnly goofy that its vision of polarized America might as well not be a satire. Scorsese’s praise sounds significant, but by leaving out the word “exploitation,” it’s his political cop-out.
>Desperate to continue authoritarian argument, they misrepresent Eddington as a grand summing-up of the era on the level of Fellini’s La Dolce Vita or Godard’s Weekend. (Consider Eddington an A24 version of what Francis Coppola flubbed in Megalopolis.) They all bypass the genuine expression of polarization captured in S. Craig Zahler’s Dragged Across Concrete or Radu Jude’s Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World, failing to see that Aster is a hysteric, not a rationalist or aesthetic moralist like Godard. The miscommunication that Scorsese’s blurb refers to as the essence of our crise is the product of both political tragedy and B-movie sensationalism.