>>24794804
>Yeah, after massive application of keynesian stimulus policies
Marx predicted, because globalization and technology have reduced profit margins. Keynesian economics is necessary because capitalism may collapse without measures that boost profits, such as consumer debt. This is an inherent flaw in capitalism, one that Marx identified, which capitalists may struggle to address.

You don’t address what causes recessions because you would have to admit you're wrong. You focus on the effects of capitalism without addressing the underlying reasons for them. Marx explained these causes, and he was correct. The empirical data supports his conclusions and contradicts yours.
>Investors diversify their assets depending of risk. Public debt bonds are generally consider a lower risk investment than variable rent of the stock market or dividends.
Again, you are pivoting. Why don't you address the fact that countries like the UK have low profit rates and high public debt ratios? You keep discussing bonds but fail to recognize that government borrowing is neither natural nor sustainable. Nor do you explain why businesses need to borrow money from the government to sustain themselves instead of relying on profits.

Instead of avoiding reality, confront it. You can't, because doing so would lead you to the obvious contradiction: that low profit rates, which Marx predicted, correctly illustrate the end result of capitalism.