>>64139410
Assuming you mean Chinese, yes I think that the revolution was justified and I would go so far as to say that the old government earned it's loss via such a long list of reasons that it'd be an entire college course alone.
That does not mean that Mao's Big Adventure was anything but an absolute nightmare which is one of the main things responsible for China being in a situation where they are now just as corrupt and stagnant as the government they overthrew, arguably even worse because they are excessively paranoid about it happening again.
The cycle of bureaucracy seems like an inevitable part of human society, China did the right thing by letting the bloated tumor die off and have something new take it's place, but the problem is that there's nothing stopping the new thing from falling victim to the exact same cycle on an even faster timeline unless you explicitly try to put checks and balances in place to allow political movements and policies to die off within the system without compromising the entire entity, essentially letting you reset the cycle to stage 3~4 before things get too bad. The US arguably used to be pretty good at this, but the "powers that be" have been trying their best to erode these checks and balances since the day the county was born and I think it may reach the tipping point eventually that our system can no longer effectively trim the fat and, like every other bureaucratic system before it, either implode or slowly fade into irrelevance as it can't keep up.
Tl;dr-
>Why contain it? 'scool.
