>>936266267
Since my death I have changed:
Rights are for those who do not dare to be warriors. I would gladly give my life to save the West from the communist threat if ordered to walk into hell. But one thing sticks to my boot and just will not come off, if they are happy there and we are happy at home, why do we try to take those places which are not either one of ours. Some anons have some valid points today. Particularly about getting to grips with those places that spread until they die off. In my reality, we wait for those people to catch up with the state of the West, we do not bring them home, we do not deploy ourselves, we deploy the media that makes them us.
Propaganda, which they do not even mind.
Give the third world televisions and let them build the pipes and farms themselves.
I do not want to die in Rwanda for a tribe that does not know the first thing about me, and I do not want to die in a rice paddy for those who betray rules several thousand miles away from where those rules are based.
tl;dr
The absence of war is the absence of the will to change those who threaten themselves, unless you do it remotely.