>>510837911
It's honestly amazing what people were able to build just 50-60 years ago. A bridge like this is considered an impossible feat of engineering that would take almost two generations to build, when the original was built in just 3 years.
Note that this is a picture of what """"historians""" claim to be a """"bridge"""", using lost technology that was """"conveniently""" erased. I ask you, if bridges really existed why can't americans build them now? What happened? What are they hiding?
4chan Search
2 results for "4a5c8eef82351f54bf54890130efa53d"
>>22959389
It's honestly amazing what people were able to build just 50-60 years ago. A bridge like this is considered an impossible feat of engineering that would take almost two generations to build, when the original was built in just 3 years.
Note that this is a picture of what """"historians""" claim to be a """"bridge"""", using lost technology that was """"conveniently""" erased. I ask you, if bridges really existed why can't americans build them now? What happened? What are they hiding?
It's honestly amazing what people were able to build just 50-60 years ago. A bridge like this is considered an impossible feat of engineering that would take almost two generations to build, when the original was built in just 3 years.
Note that this is a picture of what """"historians""" claim to be a """"bridge"""", using lost technology that was """"conveniently""" erased. I ask you, if bridges really existed why can't americans build them now? What happened? What are they hiding?